Legal Opinion
Easkold v. Rhodes
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 4, 1993No. 79138PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
614 So.2d 495 (1993)
Donna EASKOLD, Petitioner,
v.
James RHODES, Jr., et ux., Respondents.
No. 79138.
Supreme Court of Florida.
March 4, 1993.
Robert P. Gaines of Beggs & Lane, Pensacola, for petitioner.
Thomas E. Wheeler, Jr. of Bell, Schuster & Wheeler, P.A., Pensacola, for respondent.
Ada A. Hammond of Taylor, Day & Rio, Jacksonville, amicus curiae for State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Jack W. Shaw, Jr. of Osborne, McNatt, Shaw, O'Hara, Brown & Obringer, P.A., Jacksonville, amicus curiae for Florida Defense Lawyers Ass'n.
HARDING, Justice.
We have for review Rhodes v. Easkold, 588 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1st DCA…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shaw v. PuleoSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
- Morey v. HarperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Faucher v. RCF DEVELOPERSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Burton v. PowellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Rhodes v. EaskoldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by56 opinions
- Ullman v. City of Tampa Parks Dept.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Wald v. GraingerSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Van v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Gross v. LyonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Weygant v. Fort Myers Lincoln Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1994
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.