Legal Opinion
Rhodes v. Easkold
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 10, 1991No. 90-3840PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
588 So.2d 267 (1991)
James RHODES, Jr., and Elouise Rhodes, Husband and Wife, Appellants,
v.
Donna EASKOLD, Appellee.
No. 90-3840.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
October 10, 1991.
Rehearing Denied November 27, 1991.
Thomas E. Wheeler, Jr., of Bell, Schuster & Wheeler, P.A., Pensacola, for appellants.
Robert P. Gaines, of Beggs & Lane, Pensacola, for appellee.
SHIVERS, Judge.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, appeal the trial court's denial of their motion for new trial. We reverse, and remand for a new trial.
The record indicates that appellants, James and Elouise Rhodes, were involved…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morey v. HarperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Faucher v. RCF DEVELOPERSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Horowitz v. American Motorist Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Scarfone v. MagaldiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
3Cited by8 opinions
- Easkold v. RhodesSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Ullman v. City of Tampa Parks Dept.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Dempsey ex rel. Dempsey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Rose v. DwinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Dempsey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.