Legal Opinion

Marks v. Shoup

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 13, 1901No. 82PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKeNna

This is an action for damages, brought by the plaintiff in error, who was also plaintiff in' the court below, and we will' therefore so designate him, against, the defendant, by .virtue of his office, caused by the taking from the possession of the plaintiff of a certain- stock of goods, wares and merchandise.

The goods originally belonged to one Joe- Levy, who sold them to one Levine by verbal sale, and as .a part of the consideration Levine assumed to pay a debt due to the plaintiff. Levine sold them to one Kendall, who assumed to pay the same debt. Kendall sold and delivered them to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matthews v. DensmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Batchellor v. RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Williams v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bryan v. KerSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Price v. Boot ShopOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Shoup v. MarksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
  4. Sabin v. ChrismanOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Collins v. Pacific Underwriters, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API