Williams v. Mitchell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
On June 11, 1887, the plaintiff sold and conveyed to the defendants six lots of land containing twenty acres each, and at the same time assigned to the defendants certain written obligations of the Bear Valley Land and Water Company (a corporation), to furnish and deliver at a certain point a certain quantity ©f water to be used on each of said lots, called “ water certificates.” The consideration to be paid by the defendants for the land and water certificates was twenty-four thousand dollars, of which six thousand dollars was paid in hand. For the balance of the purchase-money…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Marks v. ShoupSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Sabin v. ChrismanOregon Supreme Court · 1918