Legal Opinion

Kevin Lavelle Kent v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided August 28, 2014No. 14-13-00375-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARON McCALLY, Justice.

In an issue of first impression, we must decide whether statutory violations aggregated for purposes of Section 31.09 of the Penal Code, the aggregate theft statute, are elements that the jury must unanimously agree upon, or whether the violations are mere manner and means for which no unanimity is required. 1 Deter mining what elements of a statute require unanimity is a matter of legislative intent. In construing the aggregate theft statute, we conclude that unanimity is required for the gravamina of the underlying statutory violations that are aggregated for…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Ngo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  3. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Reeves, Gary PatrickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  5. Cosio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kent, Kevin LavelleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Andrew Garraway v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  3. Andrew Garraway v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  4. Andrew Garraway v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  5. Kent, Kevin LavelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API