State v. Disandro
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUNN, Judge.
Defendant Emilio Disandro appeals from a four-count conviction in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis for selling a Schedule I controlled substance — heroin. He claims that the trial court erred by overruling his objection to a prosecutorial comment that indirectly defined reasonable doubt in contravention to the Notes on Use for the burden of proof instruction, MAI-CR 2.20, and the well established rule in Missouri. He also cites as error the trial court’s refus*935al to submit his instructions on entrapment to the jury. We affirm.
Defendant was arrested after selling heroin to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- State v. DeckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- State v. VanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. BellevilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. WeinzerlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- State v. SproulMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. WorstellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.