Legal Opinion

State v. Worstell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1989No. 54654PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

Defendant, Kwicha Worstell, was convicted by a jury of Bribery of a Public Servant, § 576.010 RSMo.1986. She was sentenced to 60 days imprisonment and fined $5,000.00. She appeals. We affirm.

At trial, defendant properly raised the defense of entrapment and the jury was instructed on it. On appeal, defendant contends the state failed to meet its burden of proving lack of entrapment, and, therefore, she argues, the trial court erred in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal. We disagree.

“An ‘entrapment’ is perpetrated if a law enforcement officer ..., for the purpose of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. State v. ChunnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State v. CoffmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. PilchakMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. SproulMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. State v. O'NEILLCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. State v. WhitfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API