Legal Opinion

Anderson v. City and County of San Francisco

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 2, 2014No. 11-16746, 11-16752, 11-17330PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURGUIA, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs, current and former deputies of the San Francisco Sheriffs Department (“SFSD”), appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the City and County of San Francisco (the “County”) on their challenge to SFSD’s policy prohibiting male deputies from supervising female inmates in the housing units of SFSD’s jails. The district court concluded that SFSD’s policy did not violate Title VIPs prohibition on sex discrimination because it fell within the statute’s “bona fide occupational qualification” exception, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(e)(l). We…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. George McGinest v. Gte Service Corp. Mike BiggsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Allstate Insurance Companies v. Charles HerronCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Robert Reese, Jr. v. County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Brianna Bolden-Hardge v. California State ControllerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. Chad Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Taylor v. First Advantage Background Services Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  5. Smith v. California Department of Highway PatrolDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API