Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 2015No. Case No. 20130556PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PARRISH,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Roger Taylor was charged with multiple counts of securities fraud and theft on the basis of his alleged operation of a Ponzi scheme. Mr. Taylor asked the district court to dismiss eight of the ten charges based on the applicable statutes of limitations. The district court concluded that securities fraud and theft are continuing offenses and evaluated the timeliness of the charges according ly. On interlocutory review, we hold that securities fraud and theft are not continuing offenses and therefore remand the case to the district court to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Alan Scop, Raphael Bloom, Herbert Stone and Jack RingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. ReadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Ronald J. Perholtz, United States of America v. Franklin W. Jackson, United States of America v. Gregory W. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  5. Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. TroiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. ArguellesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  3. State v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  4. State v. KayUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. CasasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API