State Highway Department v. Edmunds
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Presiding Judge.
Twice during the trial of the case the condemnor made motions for a mistrial, once because the trial court allegedly expressed an opinion as to the evidence and once when the condemnee made a statement considered prejudicial by the condemnor. In both instances the trial court overruled the motions but instructed the jury so as to eliminate any injury to the condemnor’s case by the allegedly improper statements. Thereafter, no further objection was made by the condemnor and, under the decision of the Supreme Court in Ivy v. State, 220 Ga. 699, 704 (141 SE2d 541), and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gulf Refining Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Lewis v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Ivy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Webb v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Berglund-Cherne Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Gibbs v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Doughty v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Department of Transportation v. SEQUOYAH LAND INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- State Highway Department v. RosenfeldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.