Chagnon v. Union-Leader Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
Defendant maintains that (1) plaintiff failed to establish or sustain his case; (2) it established a complete defense to the action; (3) the Trial Court admitted certain incompetent evidence; (4) a mistrial should have been ordered because the foreman of the jury was not indifferent; (5) the Trial Court erred in its instructions to the jury relative to cheating and malice; (6) the verdict was against the law and the evidence and was grossly excessive.
The first promotional advance notice of an article concerning the plaintiff appeared in the Union-Leader on July 3, 1954. The article published…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Emde v. San Joaquin County Central Labor CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hoeppner v. Dunkirk Printing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Mattox v. News Syndicate Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Proto v. Bridgeport Herald CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Erick Bowman Remedy Co. v. Jensen Salsbery Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Jeffrey Kassel v. Gannett Co., Inc., D/B/A "Usa Today,"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Duchesnaye v. Munro Entersprises, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Lassonde v. StantonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Vratsenes v. N. H. Auto, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.