Legal Opinion
Suprise v. Dekock
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided August 22, 2002No. 13-00-640-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice DORSEY.
This summary judgment case involves a suit by Ron and Maria Suprise for damages resulting from an alleged tortious interference with the use and enjoyment of their land by appellees, Jim DeKock, Jr., and Pat Edwards. Appellees obtained a summary judgment denying recovery because tortious interference with the use and enjoyment of land is not a recognized cause of action in Texas. The issue is whether a cause of action exists in Texas for tortious interference with the use and enjoyment of land. We reverse and remand.
I. Allegations and PROCEDURAL HistoRY
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SturgesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Texas Department of Corrections v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ski River Development, Inc. v. McCalla, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Marrs & Smith Partnership v. D.K. Boyd Oil & Gas Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
- Cleveland Regional Medical Center, L.P. v. Celtic Properties, L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
- Ogle v. Comcast Corp. (In re Houston Regional Sports Network, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
- Texas International Property Associates v. Hoerbiger Holding AGDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.