Legal Opinion

Ron Suprise and Maria Estela Suprise v. Jim Dekock, Jr. and Pat Edwards

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 22, 2002No. 13-00-00640-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NUMBER 13-00-640-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

RON SUPRISE AND

MARIA ESTELA SUPRISE, Appellants,

v.

JIM DEKOCK, JR. AND

PAT EDWARDS, Appellees.

On appeal from the 332nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Dorsey, Yañez, and Chavez[1]

Opinion by Justice Dorsey

This summary judgment case involves a suit by Ron and Maria Suprise for damages resulting from an alleged tortious interference with the use and enjoyment of their land by appellees, Jim DeKock, Jr., and Pat Edwards. Appellees obtained a summary judgment denying recovery because…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SturgesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Texas Department of Corrections v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API