Business Men's Assur. Co. v. Campbell
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TRIEBER, District Judge.
This is the second time this cause is before us on writ of error. On the former hearing the cause was reversed. 6 F.(2d) 540. The issues involved are set out fully in the opinion in that ease and need not be again stated. On the second trial both parties requested a directed verdict, the court sustaining that of the plaintiff.
It is too well settled to require citations of authorities that, if both parties to the action request, at the conclusion of all the evidence a directed verdict, and no other requests are made, the direction of a verdict is equivalent to a verdict…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Takao Ozawa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Stewart v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Brookside Theatre Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
- Dumas v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Orlando Candy Co. v. New Hampshire Fire Ins. Co. of ManchesterDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1931
- Baxter v. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.