Legal Opinion

Menendez v. Terhune

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 7, 2005No. 03-55863, 03-56023PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TROTT, Circuit Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this consolidated appeal, Lyle and Erik Menendez 1 appeal the district court’s denial of their petitions for habeas corpus. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), we granted a certificate of appealability on five issues: (1) whether the admission of a tape-recorded session between Petitioners and their therapist violated Petitioners’ constitutional due process rights as elaborated in Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985); (2) whether the trial court’s decision not to instruct the jury on imperfect self-defense violated…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. United States v. Kincaid-ChaunceyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. State v. RoederSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. Ernest Lee Brazzel v. State of Washington v. Alice PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Rafael Cruz-EscotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API