Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Milliken
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 18, 1987No. 86-1487PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Black Parents for Quality Education (BPQE), Ludington School Community Organization (LSCO) and approximately sixty individuals, appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion to intervene in the advanced remedial stage of this Detroit school desegregation case. Proposed intervenors assert that they had a right to intervene under Rule 24(a) or, alternatively, that the district court abused its discretion in denying their motion for permissive intervention under Rule 24(b). Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a), (b). For the following reasons, we affirm the district court’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Perry County Board of Education, Joann Parsons, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless & Service Employees International Union, Local 1199 v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Michigan State Afl-Cio v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Scotty Grubbs, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Proposed Intervenor/appellant v. Stephen H. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Christina Thompson, Debtor. Sanford A. Kowal v. Charles M. MalkemusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Timothy Jansen, Cross-Appellants v. City of Cincinnati v. Tilford Youngblood, Prospective Intervenors, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.