Legal Opinion
United States v. Tom Crutchfield, Penny Crutchfield
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 26, 1994No. 92-3211PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellants Tom and Penny Crutchfield were convicted by a jury of charges involving the illegal importation and the intent to sell certain Figi banded iguanas in the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 545 and 371, and .16 U.S.C. §§ 3372(a)(1) and 3373(d)(1)(A) and (B). Both appellants subsequently filed timely motions for a new trial, asserting pervasive prosecutorial misconduct throughout the course of their first trial. The district court denied these motions. Appellants now appeal their respective convictions, contending that the prosecutor’s numerous…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. McLainCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Robert Irving Eyster, A/K/A Bobby, Jack Leroy MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. WeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Sanjuana Ruiz CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- United States v. HornbackCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. Morgan Chase WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Coquina Investments v. TD Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Jesus Hernando Angulo MosqueraCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Jeffrey Jason CooperCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.