Legal Opinion

United States v. Weinstein

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 12, 1985No. Nos. 83-5260, 83-5570PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge:

This appeal addresses two separate criminal actions joined at trial and consolidated *1526for purposes of oral argument on appeal. For clarity and efficiency we address both actions in one opinion, setting out a separate disposition as to each appellant.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellants herein, Philip Weinstein, Wilhelmina Harich Weinstein,1 Solomon Rich-man, Robert Falvo, and Stanley Kowitt (hereinafter and collectively, “appellants”), were convicted by jury trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida of conspiracy in violation of the…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. United States v. Gurmeet Singh DhinsaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. United States v. NeapolitanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Dale J. Doerr, John Paul Doerr, Josephine Christofalos, Christa D. Pixley, and Archie J. PixleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Harry E. Fleischhauer v. C. Elvin Feltner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API