Legal Opinion

Frickel v. Sunnyside Enterprises, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1986No. 51614-6PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

The main issue is whether an implied warranty of habitability applies to the sale of an *715apartment complex, under the facts of this case, and in the face of a contractual disclaimer of any such warranty. The trial court found there was such an implied warranty and held for the buyers. The court did not deal with the contractual disclaimer. We accepted certification from the Court of Appeals. We reverse.

The facts are important. The plaintiffs were seeking an investment which would give them a retirement income and a tax benefit. The defendants were builders of apartment complexes for their own…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Petersen v. Hubschman Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Tavares v. HorstmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. House v. ThorntonWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Berg v. StrommeWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Yepsen v. BurgessOregon Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. American Nursery Products, Inc. v. Indian Wells OrchardsWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Stuart v. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Centex Homes v. BuecherTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Cox v. Lewiston Grain Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API