Mazzaccaro v. Jermyn-Green Coal Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kenworthey, J.,
This appeal requires us to straighten out a procedural entanglement which resulted primarily from the failure of the Workmen’s Compensation Board to appreciate the separate and distinct functions performed by petitions filed under §§413, 423, 425 and 426 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law 1 and, secondarily, because it ignored or overlooked our frequent pronouncements to the effect that, in the spirit of liberality in the adminis tration of this branch of the law, the substance of a petition should prevail and the label given to it be disregarded. Gleyze v. Hale Coal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scipani v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Calabria v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Powell v. Hills GarageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Hill v. Booth & Flinn Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Morgan v. SandersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bartman v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Royal Factories, Inc. v. GarciaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Liberatori v. Scott Smith Cadillac Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Aviation v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Collins v. American Brake Shoe Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County1965