Legal Opinion

Guelfi v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1983No. Civ. 52253PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SMITH, J.

This appeal from the denial of a petition for writ of mandate presents the question whether appellants, retired Police Officers Robert Guelfi and Steven Kane (petitioners below), are entitled, under the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (Gov. Code, tit. 3, div. 4, eh. 3 (§ 31450 et seq.)) 1 as subsequently amended (hereinafter CERL), to have their disability retirement payments calculated on the basis of preretirement earnings including amounts received for overtime, educational incentive pay and uniform allowance.

The County of Marin (County) has adopted CERL as the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. CaudilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. BelleciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Retirement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. San Miguel Consolidated Fire Protection District v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Lanyi v. GoldblumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Alameda Cnty. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Alameda Cnty. Employees' Ret. Assn., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API