Legal Opinion

McCormick v. City of Lawrence

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 21, 2005No. 90,853PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Luckert, J.:

Shawn P. McCormick sued the City of Lawrence (City) and various police officers for violating the strip and body caviiy search statutes, K.S.A. 22-2521 and K.S.A. 22-2522, which are made actionable by K.S.A. 22-2523. The district court dismissed McCormick’s lawsuit, ruling that it was not filed within the applicable statute of limitations. The district court found that McCormick’s cause of action was a general tort covered by the 2-year statute of limitations set forth in K.S.A. 2003 Supp. 60-513, not an action based upon a liability created by a statute covered by the 3-year…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Farmer v. PerrillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  3. Kedra v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Dotson v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. Haag v. Dry Basement, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Valadez v. Emmis CommunicationsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Burnett v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Eastman v. Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  4. Lehman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. VickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API