Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Vick

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 8, 2016No. AC 14-P-1150PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKafker, C.J.

The defendant, Tyrone Vick, was convicted of possession of a class B substance, see G. L. c. 94C, § 34, following a jury trial. He appeals, arguing that the motion judge erred in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized as the result of a stop, a search at the scene, and a search at the police station. The search at the police station involved the use of force to pull down the defendant’s pants and to remove a plastic bag containing drugs (which an officer had felt during the search at the scene) protruding from his buttocks. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AgogoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  2. COMMONWEALTH v. LINCOLN FORD.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
  3. Commonwealth v. JeannisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. AgogoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. JeannisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API