Legal Opinion
Azul Pacifico, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 31, 1990No. 87-2287-LEWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
LAUGHLIN E. WATERS, Senior District Judge.
This case came on for trial before the Honorable Laughlin E. Waters, Senior United States District Judge on January 11, 1990. Sherman Stacey appeared on behalf of the plaintiff; Gwendolyn R. Poindexter, Deputy City Attorney appeared on behalf of the defendant.
FACTS
A. The Challenged Provision of the City’s Rent Control Ordinance.
Plaintiff is a family owned and controlled corporation which has the Tahitian Terrace Mobile Home Park as its principal asset. Plaintiff built the mobile home park in 1961 and has operated it continuously…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Azul Pacifico, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1991
- CMC Real Estate Corp. v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Rail & Water DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Azul Pacifico, Incorporated, a California Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation, Azul Pacifico, Incorporated, a California Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991