Legal Opinion

Garlick v. Imgruet

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1930No. 19257. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

Robert J..Garlick filed an amended bill.in.the circuit • court- of Cook- county, to set aside .as - f raudulent .a - copyey- . anee-by Joseph A..Imgruet, Sr.,, and Mae .Imgruet,.his yfife,.. to Russell H. Augspurger of two lots in the city of Chicago and for the specific performance of a contract whereby Imgruet agreed to convey the same lots to the complainant. Imgruet and his wife and Augspurger and Josephine, his wife, were made defendants to the amended bill. Three answers were filed, one by Imgruet, another by his wife, and the third by Augspurger and his wife. Replications were filed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beidler v. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Zwick v. CatavenisIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Marske v. WillardIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Moore v. Machinery Sales Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Citizens Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FischerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  2. Cities Service Oil Co. v. VieringIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Majewski v. GallinaIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Connolly v. GishwillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
  5. Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API