Legal Opinion

J. Sussman, Inc. v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1988PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The record amply demonstrates that the plaintiff failed to timely notify the defendant in writing of the alleged forgeries as required by the agreement of the parties and by Uniform *669Commercial Code § 4-406 (1) and (2); hence, the plaintiff cannot prevail in the instant action. Moreover, the plaintiff cannot avoid this result by alleging in conclusory fashion that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care in paying the items (see, Uniform Commercial Code § 4-103 [1]; § 4-406 [3]). The defendant submitted an affidavit of its assistant vice-president in charge of its retail bookkeeping…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Qassemzadeh v. IBM Poughkeepsie Employees Federal Credit UnionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Herzog v. Union National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Simcoe & Erie General Insurance v. Chemical BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  4. Crockrom v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. Proactive Dealer Services, Inc. v. TD BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API