Legal Opinion
Schrenker v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 2010No. 29A02-0902-CV-128PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Michelle Schrenker and her husband Marcus were the subjects of an action by the Indiana Securities Commissioner. Marcus had been a registered investment adviser representative but he continued to provide investment services after his registration expired. He ultimately fled the state "with an unknown amount of investor money and/or assets purchased with investor money." (App. at 15.) The Commissioner's complaint named Mareus, Michelle, and their three corporations as defendants, and alleged the defendants collectively engaged in acts that violated the Indiana Securities Act.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Monsen v. Consolidated Dressed Beef Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Mendelsohn v. Capital Underwriters, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Kirchoff v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Irmscher v. McCue Ex Rel. McCueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Smeigh v. Johns Manville, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Old National Bank v. Steven Kelly, Jon A. Cook, and Rebecca F. Cook, individually and on behalf of others similarly situatedIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Julie Greenbank v. Great American Assurance CompCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- In the Matter of the Estate of Nathaniel Kappel v. William Kappel, Judith Kappel, and Mark KappelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- United Tactical Systems, LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.