Legal Opinion

Mendelsohn v. Capital Underwriters, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 24, 1979No. C-75-1259, C-76-1492 WHOPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORRICK, District Judge.

On April 20, 1979, following extended discovery and briefing and lengthy oral argument, and after reviewing the numerous affidavits, pleadings, documents, answers to interrogatories, depositions, and other papers filed in the above-captioned cases, this Court granted three motions for summary judgment brought by defendants Harris, Kerr, Forster & Co., an accounting firm, and David Latham, the manager of its Honolulu office (hereinafter collectively referred to as “HKF”), defendants Carlsmith, Carlsmith, Wichman & Case, a law firm, and George Grubb and James…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  4. Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,351 Billie Jean Woodward v. Metro Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Metge v. BaehlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. KESSI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Metge v. BaehlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. In Re Gas Reclamation, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. W.O. Akin v. Q-L Investments, Inc., Etc., Laventhol & HorwathCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API