Legal Opinion

Feuquay v. McAlister

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 22, 1924No. 15477PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRISON. J.

This is an original action in this court by Courtland M. Feuquay and Homer S. Hurst, wherein, to use their language: , jrj

“Plaintiffs pray that an alternative writ of mandamus issue to the defendant upon the hearing of the merits of this action and that the defendant be ordered by this court to receive and accept the filings of these plaintiffs and cause these plaintiffs’ names to be placed upon the ballot of the Democratic primary as candidates for the Democratic nomination for the office of Lieutenant Governor of the state of Oklahoma.”

Plaintiffs allege that in October, 1923, a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stearns, Mayor v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Huddleston v. Board of Comrs. of Noble Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. State Ex Rel. Shepard v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Strother v. BolenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. McKee v. Adair County Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Westerheide v. ShillingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Board of Education of Duncan v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Marland v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Payne v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Board of Commissioners v. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API