Legal Opinion
Bank of New York v. Bell
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 11, 2010PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
This petition for review, brought pursuant to General Statutes § 51-164x (c)1 and Practice Book § 77-1,2 requires us to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion by sealing certain documents in the underlying foreclosure action.3 The pro se petitioner, Johnathan Bell, alleges in his brief that, by sealing the documents at issue, the court (1) denied him due process by failing to follow the relevant rules of *840practice,4 and (2) abused its discretion because (a) the respondent, The Bank of New York, as trustee of BS ALT A 2005-9, waived its right to have the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Virginia Gambale v. Deutsche Bank Ag, Bankers Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- The Permian Corporation and Occidental Petroleum Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Elm City Cheese Co. v. FedericoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. KOMISARJEVSKYSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Sinchak v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Hopkins v. BalachandranConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Bank of New York v. BellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Bank of New York v. BellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.