Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The challenged specific findings. The commission found that Hilty had been employed by Justro “for about three years.” Appellants correctly point out that Hilty’s employment by Justro had begun four months before his death. This error is immaterial.
The commission found that the dogs had been “taken over” from Ready and belonged to Justro. If appears, as asserted by appellants, that Ready retained ownership of the dogs until they were sold or given away. The evidence, however, would support a finding that Justro undertook the disposal of the dogs and that Barr was acting in the course of his…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Olson Rug Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Metzger v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beecher v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Keene v. InsleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Begel v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- San Antonio v. Al Izzi's Motor Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
- Beecher v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004