Begel v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.
¶1. The Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) appeals the circuit court's reversal of LIRC's decision denying worker's compensation to Marshall E. Begel because LIRC concluded that Begel's injury was not compensable under the Worker's Compensation Act. Because we conclude that no substantial and credible evidence in the record supports LIRC's finding that Begel's supervisor did not ask him to perform the task that resulted in his injury and that LIRC's statutory interpretation of what constitutes the premises of the employer and its interpretation of the private errand doctrine are…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- West Bend Education Ass'n v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Nigbor v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Weiss v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lozano v. Frank DeLuca ConstructionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Xcel Energy Services, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- DeBoer Transportation, Inc. v. SwensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- ABC for Health, Inc. v. Commissioner of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Epic Staff Management, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.