Legal Opinion

The Mary Patten

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 15, 1872PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In admiralty.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

The parties have agreed to accept the assessor’s report upon all matters of fact, and have submitted to me the questions of salvage and of costs. The steamer took the schooner in tow after the collision, and. still later, hired a tug that completed the service. When deciding the general merits of the case, I intimated the opinion that towage might perhaps be allowed; and I then understood that the libel for salvage would not be pressed if the steamer was found to be in fault. But my decision being that both vessels were in fault, the question has been brought up again.…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Philadelphia & R. R. Co. v. Warren Foundry & Machine Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1884
  2. Pennsylvania R. v. GoldenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1917
  3. Ingraham v. J. S. Packard Dredging Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1931
  4. Leonard v. WhitwillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1884
  5. The PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API