Legal Opinion

In Re Schoeneberg

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas

Decided April 7, 1993No. 19-60111PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON DEBTOR’S AMENDED PLAN

FRANK R. MONROE, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Court held hearings on confirmation of the Debtor’s Amended Plan on January 21, 1993, and January 28, 1993. Pursuant to the record established, the briefs of the parties, the arguments of counsel, and the Court’s own independent research, this Memorandum Opinion is being entered as Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law under Bankruptcy Rules 7052 and 9014. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(L) since it is a contested matter dealing with confirmation of the Debtor’s Amended Plan. The matter…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Coder v. ArtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Sexton v. DreyfusSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. City of New York v. SaperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. In the Matter of Beverly Hills Bancorp, a California Corporation, Debtor. Commercial Paper Holders v. R.W. Hine, as Trustee of Beverly Hills BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  2. In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. In Re Coram Healthcare Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2004
  4. In Re Dow Corning Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  5. Beguelin v. Volcano Vision, Inc. (In Re Beguelin)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API