Hodges v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Upon further consideration, we have reached the conclusion that we misconstrued the judgment in this ease and that the sentences on the first and second counts are to run consecutively and not concurrently. This makes it necessary for us to consider the appeal from the judgment on the first count.
We have stated substantially all of the evidence in our former opinion. While the evidence established that Doyle owned and possessed the whisky and that Hodges was in actual possession of the whisky at the time the officers arrived, it failed to establish any combination,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Billingsley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Browning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Lucas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Sharp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Reynolds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Horton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953