Edward Christopher Barrowes v. State

DAVIS, Justice.

[¶1] Appellant Edward Barrowes challenges his conviction of aggravated vehicular homicide as defined by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-106(b)(ii) (LexisNexis 2015). He claims the evidence presented by the State was insufficient to establish that he drove in a reckless manner. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Was the evidence sufficient to support the jury’s verdict that Barrowes was guilty of aggravated homicide by vehicle?

FACTS

[¶8] Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the State, see Hill v. State, 2016 WY 27, ¶ 20, 371 P.3d 553, 560 (Wyo. 2016), the facts established at trial are as…