Legal Opinion

Jones v. Heimgartner

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2015No. 14-3197UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

PAUL J. KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-Appellant Charles Jones, a Kansas state inmate appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) so that he may appeal the district court’s denial of his habeas petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In order to obtain a COA, Mr. Jones must make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The district court found that Mr. Jones’ petition was time-barred. Thus, Mr. Jones must show “that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Price v. PhilpotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Elliot Ray v. Marc ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Frank Huizar v. Tom CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. York v. GaletkaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Charlton Bradshaw v. Lorie Davis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API