Jones v. Heimgartner
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
PAUL J. KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-Appellant Charles Jones, a Kansas state inmate appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) so that he may appeal the district court’s denial of his habeas petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In order to obtain a COA, Mr. Jones must make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The district court found that Mr. Jones’ petition was time-barred. Thus, Mr. Jones must show “that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Price v. PhilpotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Elliot Ray v. Marc ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Frank Huizar v. Tom CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- York v. GaletkaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Charlton Bradshaw v. Lorie Davis, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018