Legal Opinion

Cunha v. Cunha

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1935No. Civ. 9808PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

From an interlocutory decree in a divorce proceeding both parties have appealed. The action was commenced by the wife. She filed a complaint alleging extreme cruelty. The husband answered and denied many of the allegations contained in the complaint and at the same time filed a cross-complaint. The plaintiff filed an answer to the cross-complaint and on the issues so made the action went to trial. In the pleadings of both parties the property rights were put in issue.

In ascertaining the property rights it transpired that the mother of the defendant claimed that the parties were indebted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gaston v. GastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Rassaert v. MenschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Grismer v. Merger Mines CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1942
  3. Stille v. StilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Walls v. System Freight ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API