Klein v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Chase
The general question in this case is whether or not the proviso relating to suits for the proceeds of abandoned and captured property in the Court of Claims, contained in the appropriation act of July 12,1870, debars the defendant in error from recovering, as administrator of Victor F. Wilson, deceased, the proceeds of certain cotton belonging to the decedent, which came into possession of the agents of the Treasury Department as captured or abandoned property, and the proceeds of which were paid by them according to law into the Treasury of the United States.
The answer to this question…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- United States v. PadelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rice v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Rice v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1886
- Board of Field Officers of South Carolina Troops v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1885
- Haym v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1891
- Villalonga v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.