Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Humble Oil & Refining Company

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1964No. A-9902PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

This suit was instituted by Humble Oil & Refining Company, Tidewater Oil Company and Cities Service Oil Company, hereafter referred to as plaintiffs, against Austin E. Stewart, hereafter referred to as Stewart, the Railroad Commission of Texas and the members thereof, hereafter referred to as the Commission. Triple S Oil Company and Wel-Rex Corporation intervened and aligned themselves with Stewart and the Commission..Plaintiffs attacked the validity of two orders issued by the Commission on March 18, 1963. By these orders, the Commission approved the bottomhole locations of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Harrington v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Texas Employment Commission v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission v. Texas Citizens for a Safe Future & Clean WaterTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Railroad Com'n of Texas v. Lone Star Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. H.G. Sledge, Inc. v. Prospective Investment & Trading Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  4. State v. HarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Harrington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API