Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Railroad Commission

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1964No. A-9702PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALVERT, Chief Justice.

The three cases to be decided were tried together in the trial court and were submitted jointly in this court on direct appeal. The cases originated as suits in the nature of appeals to the district court by Harrington from orders of the Railroad Commission of Texas.

Harrington is one of the oil operators caught up in the East Texas “slant-hole” dragnet. Two wells drilled by him as lessee on tracts of 1.1 and 5.25 acres in 1948, and a third well drilled on a tract of 34.7 acres in 1949 in which he acquired an interest in 1960, were found by directional survey in 1962 to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Railroad Commission v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Halbouty v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Texas Employment Commission v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Midas Oil Co. v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Fish v. Tandy Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft v. Olson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  3. Kawasaki Motors Corp. U.S.A. v. Texas Motor Vehicle CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Duncan Land & Exploration, Inc. v. LittlepageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. I & JC Corp. v. Helen of Troy L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API