Legal Opinion

State v. Nigel Thurston

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 30, 2023No. A23A0177Published

1Opinion of the Court

THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., GOBEIL, J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules May 30, 2023 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A23A0177. THE STATE v. THURSTON. PHIPPS, Senior Appellate Judge. The State appeals from the grant of defendant Nigel Thurston’s motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of the search of his cell phone.1 The State asserts that although it illegally downloaded the phone contents before…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Gary v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  3. Collier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  4. State v. RosenbaumSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  5. State v. StringerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API