Legal Opinion

Central Lumber Co. v. City of Waseca

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 19, 1922No. 22,778PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

This is an action to enjoin the city of Waseca from establishing and operating a municipal coal and wood yard, and from enforcing a weighing .ordinance. The trial court denied a temporary injunction and the plaintiff appeals. The questions are:(1) Whether the establishment of a municipal coal and wood yard is a public purpose for which taxes may be levied.(2) Whether the weighing ordinance is arbitrary and unreasonable or otherwise invalid só that a temporary injunction against its enforcement should issue.

*202The charter in apt terms authorizes the city council “to establish and «operate a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Laughlin v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
  3. Opinions of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Holton v. City of CamillaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. State ex rel. Kansas City v. OrearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nash v. . TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Lifteau v. Metropolitan Sports Facilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Stabs v. City of TowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Borgelt v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Nash v. Town of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API