Herbenson v. Carrols Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.
We affirm. It is a “well-settled principle that the trial court has broad discretion in supervising disclosure and in granting protective orders limiting or denying discovery” (Matter of Andrews v Trustco Bank, Natl. Assn., 289 AD2d 910, 912-913 [2001] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; accord Fox v Fox, 309 AD2d 1056, 1057 [2003]). Although we can substitute our discretion for that of the trial court regarding disclosure (see Brady v Ottaway Newspapers, 63 NY2d 1031, 1032 [1984]), we typically limit our review to whether the trial court clearly abused its discretion (see e.g.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Saratoga Harness Racing, Inc. v. RoemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Andrews v. Trustco BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Fox v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Ruthman, Mercadante & Hadjis, P. C. v. NardielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mokay v. MokayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Div-Com, Inc. v. TousignantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Cooper v. McInnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Jones v. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Ctr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Conley & Son Excavating Co. v. Delta Alliance, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.