Legal Opinion
McCarthy v. Tobin
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided February 11, 1998No. 96-P-1680PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillerman, J.
The devil that lurks in offers to purchase real estate and like instruments, which contemplate further documentation regarding the same subject matter,2 once again has triumphed. Here the parties — the buyers (McCarthy and the Di*275Miníeos) and the seller (Tobin) — have been in litigation since mid-1995; the subject is a condominium unit at Burroughs Wharf in Boston (premises).
A judge of the Superior Court allowed the seller Tobin’s motion for summary judgment and also allowed the interveners’ (DiMinicos’) motion for partial summary judgment in so far as ■ it requested the declaration that Tobin…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schwanbeck v. Federal-Mogul Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Citation Insurance v. GomezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Rosenfield v. United States Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Goren v. Royal Investments Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Levenson v. L.M.I. Realty Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCarthy v. TobinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. Norwood Realty, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. BanerjiMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000
- Zysk v. BakerMassachusetts Superior Court · 2006
- Ewiess v. Seaco InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.