Legal Opinion
Timmons v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 7, 2000No. 12A04-9904-CR-165PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
ROBB, Judge
Jay Timmons petitions this court for rehearing of our decision dated February 7, 2000. In that opinion, we held, in part, that the telephonic arrest warrant by which Timmons was arrested in his home was fatally defective, but that the exclusionary rule did not bar evidence revealed pursuant to the arrest. Timmons v. State, 723 N.E.2d 916, 920-22 (Ind.Ct.App.2000). Thus, we concluded that the trial court did not err in denying Timmons’ motion to suppress. We grant Timmons’ petition for rehearing to revisit the application of the exclusionary rule to the facts of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- New York v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Foster v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TyreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- State v. StraubIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. FelixWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Creekmore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Dalton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.