Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Pennsylvania-Ohio Power & Light Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1926No. 4305PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

The bill in this case seeks to enjoin the relocation of a portion of an intercounty highway known as the “Ohio River Road,” in the vicinity of Toronto, Ohio, involving the taking of a strip across plaintiff appellant’s land, against his contention that in such relocation the highway commissioners acted, not in the interest of public necessity, welfare, or convenience, but for the benefit of private interests only, and so in abuse of the power of eminent domain, and in violation of the Constitution of Ohio (article 1, § 19) and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Tilly v. Mitchell & Lewis Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Glasgow v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thomas E. Foster v. Mark Herley, Director of the Detroit Housing Commission, Detroit Housing Commission, City of Detroit, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  2. Arata v. Monsanto Chemical CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  3. Gruntorad v. Hughes BrothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. O'Neil v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Jim Young Development Corp. v. State Highway CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API