Legal Opinion

Jim Young Development Corp. v. State Highway Commission

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided July 22, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 1632PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS '

WILLIAM H. BECKER, Chief Judge.

This is an action in which plaintiffs seek damages for an alleged “taking” of property and of their rights to “ingress *40and egress to Route 152” from Beaman Drive, on a plot of ground owned and developed by the plaintiffs. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked on the theory that there is a “federal question” involved in this litigation so that federal jurisdiction attaches under the provisions of Section 1331, Title 28, United States Code. In the complaint herein, plaintiffs’ jurisdictional allegation is as follows:

“Thi…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Muskegon Theatres, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. City of Muskegon, a Municipal Corporation, and the Amazon Company, a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  2. Hornell Brewing Co., Inc. v. BradyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API