Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Duncan

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1915No. Civil No. 1480PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Cochise. A. C. Lockwood, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

The appellant was the plaintiff below and the appellee was the defendant. We will speak of them hereafter as plaintiff and defendant. They own and occupy for residential purposes lots in the same block in the city of Tombstone. The natural slope of the ground is such that the surface waters run from plaintiff’s premises on to and over the premises of defendant. On the lowest part of his land, and adjoining the land of defendant, plaintiff has a stable and horse lot, over which surface and flood waters were accustomed to run, and, if not interfered with, these waters naturally passed on to and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walker v. New Mexico & Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. City of Tucson v. DunseathArizona Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProebstelArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Grande v. CassonArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Roosevelt Irrigation District v. Beardsley Land & Investment Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Diedrich v. FarnsworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Palmer v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API