City of Tucson v. Dunseath
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Pima. W. F. Cooper, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The appellee is the owner of lot 17, block 3, of the city of Tucson. Lots 18, 19, and 20 in same block are *357owned by one Allen B. Jaynes. All these lots face on First street, and lot 20 is on the west side of Third avenue. Block 3 was a part of the original grant by the United States government to the city of Tucson. It was platted into lots, and First street and Third avenue were dedicated by the city. Extending across block 3 and lots 17, 18, 19, and 20 thereof was a natural swale or depression, the general course of which was southwesterly and northeasterly. This swale reached easterly some…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Walker v. New Mexico & Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Jordan v. City of BenwoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- Sheehan v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Hughes v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProebstelArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Scottsdale v. KokaskaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Grande v. CassonArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Tucson v. FahringerArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Tucson v. WondergemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.